Introduction
Zinc (Zn) was acknowledged as essential nutrient for plants in 1926 and soon after for mammals in 1934 (Nielsen 2012). It is vital for many enzymes of protein synthesis, energy transfer and nitrogen metabolism. Its deficiency not only impedes plant growth and yield, but also adversely affects human health (Graham et al. 2001; Cakmak 2002) that’s why soil deficits in Zn have to be applied with Zn fertilizers to fulfill the nutritional requirements of plants (Wyszkowska et al. 2013). However, being the most mobile and bioavailable nutrient its higher concentration in soil may cause phytotoxicity in plants (Reichman 2002; Sagardoy et al. 2009).
Supra-optimal Zn concentration in plants causes leaf chlorosis, instabilities in photosynthesis and chlorophyll synthesis (Wang et al. 2009). Its excess also induces oxidative damage, disturbs the protein synthesis and development of organelles in plants (Panda et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2009).
Zinc is also a common pollutant in the area of traffic routes (Malinowska et al. 2015), most of its quantity comes from petrol, lubricant oil leaks, brake linings, by wear and tear of tyres and from galvanized parts of automobiles (Thorpe and Harrison 2008; Nazzal et al. 2013) as well as from soot and heavy metal oxides, which runoff into roadside soil after precipitation (Malinowska et al. 2015). The plants growing on such soils accumulate metals that may enter into human and animal body through consumption of these plants (Nauciene et al. 2002; Liu et al. 2007).
The contamination of roadside soil by trace metals is directly proportional to traffic density on roads (Werkenthin et al. 2014), moreover, level of vehicular released metals in roadside soil and plants got increased considerably during last few years (Onder and Dursun 2006). Celik et al. (2005) reported four times higher metal concentration in roadside vegetation than control sites vegetation. This concentration drops with distance from roadsides (Joshi et al. 2010; Mmolawa et al. 2010; Werkenthin et al. 2014). Seasonal and spatial variations also influence metal contents in soil (Pathak et al. 2015). The use of native plant species to monitor the level of metal contamination is quite economic, convenient, and aesthetically pleasing technique in which the natural ability of environment is benefited to restore itself (Hernandez-Allica et al. 2008).
Several plant species have been reported as good indicator/monitor of metal pollution. Amongst them, the role of Nerium oleander (Mignorance and Oliva 2006), Robinia pseudo-acacia (Celik et al. 2005), Eucalyptu spp., Prosopis juliflora and Dalbergia sissoo (Naveed et al. 2010), Casuarina equisetifolia (Aissa and Keloufi 2012), Ageratum conyzoides (Deepalakshmi et al. 2014) and Synedrella nodiflora and Chromolaena odorata (Okoronkwo et al. 2014) to monitor environmental metal pollution has already been studied. The present study monitored the Zn contamination in roadside soil and plants. Information obtained can contribute in identification of phytomonitors of metal pollution.
Materials and Methods
Study area description
Punjab, the most populated province of Pakistan, has a huge network of roads. “National Highway (N-5)”and “Faisalabad to Okara Road (FOR)” are two high trafficked roads in the central Punjab. “Faisalabad to Okara Road (FOR)” is 103 km long and interconnect Faisalabad to Okara by passing the Ravi River. This road has numerous human settings (villages, towns), cultivated field areas and marketplaces along it. Animal driven carts, motorbikes, rickshaw, vans and mini buses are major contributors of traffic load on this road. National Highway 5 (N-5) is 1819 km long and interconnects Karachi to Torkham. A section of it from Okara to Lahore (129 km) was selected for study. This road is quite busy and in good state having several urban settlements along it. The vehicles on N-5 includes multi wheeler loaders, air-conditioned buses, vans, mini buses, oil tankers, trucks and cars and remains busy throughout the year.
Sampling and metal analysis
Excluding the markets and residential areas, five sites were selected randomly along each (FOR and N-5) road (Fig. 1). Samples and data were collected in the mid of each of four seasons. The five commonly growing native plant species (Cenchrus ciliaris L., Cynodon dactylon L., Calotropis procera A., Ricinus communis L., and N. oleander L.) were selected for study at each site along both roads (Table 1). Leaves from each selected plant and soil samples (up to 10 cm deep) were collected at each site along roadside. Same plant species and soil samples were collected at a distance of ~ 50 m from roadside and labeled as control (Jian-Hua et al. 2009). All leaf samples were washed with deionized distilled water to get rid of Table 1: Description (botanical and vernacular names) of plant species grown in the study area
Botanical name | English name | Vernacular name | Abbreviations used |
Cenchrus ciliaris L. | Buffel grass | Dhaman | C. ciliaris |
Cynodon dactylon L. | Bermuda grass | Khabbal | C. dactylon |
Calotropis procera A. | Apple of Sodom | Ak | C. procera |
Nerium oleander L. | Oleander | Kaner | N. oleander |
Ricinus communis L. | Castor oil plant | Arind | R. communis |
soil particles and dried in an oven (65°C) then ground to powder using Wiley Mill. Collected soil samples were sieved (2-mm) and dried in oven (65°C) for 72 h. By using HNO3 and H2O2, plant and soil samples were digested on a hot block digester (Environmental Express, Mt. Pleasant, SC) by following USEPA method 3050B for metal analysis (de Oliveira et al. 2015) and analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). Standard plant leaves and soil reference materials (accuracy=100 ± 20%), Internal standards and reagent blanks were used to ensure precision and accuracy in analysis.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were carried through program COSTAT computer package by Cohort software (2003) Monterey, California, U.S.A. Means were compared with LSD test (α = 0.05) (Steel and Torrie 1997). The correlation was determined by Excel.
Results
Zn contents in roadside soil
Zn contents in roadside soil were higher than the control samples (Table 2). During seasons, highest Zn concentration was recorded at “Tandaliawala” site along “FOR” and “Chung” site along “N-5”. Furthermore, seasonal variations were also noticed for soil Zn content with highest during summer and least during winter season along both roads.
Zn contents in roadside plant leaves
Zn content in plant leaves were higher than the control (Table 3). Among all plants along “FOR”, maximum Zn accumulation was found in R. communis and minimum in C. ciliaris (Fig. 2). Similarly, along “N-5”, maximum Zn concentration was also noted in R. communis and minimum in C. ciliaris (Fig. 3). The spatial comparison along “FOR” showed that Zn content in plant leaves at “Tandaliawala” site was highest among all sites while “Satghara More” site presented least Zn content along this road (Fig. 4). Along “N-5” highest Zn content in plant leaves were observed at “Chung” and lowest at “Pattoki” site (Fig. 5). Nevertheless, Zn content in all trafficked sites were significantly higher than the non-trafficked site. The seasonal comparison for accumulation of Zn in plant leaves along both roads were observed in the following order summer>autumn >spring > winter (Fig. 6, 7).
Comparison among Roads (“FOR” and “N-5”) for Zn contents in soil and plant leaves
A comparison between roads for Zn content in both plant leaves and soil showed highest Zn content along N-5 and least along ‘FOR” (Fig. 8, 9).
Correlation of traffic density with soil and plant metal
Fig. 1: Map showing sites on “FOR” and “N-5”
Khanuana, Sataiana, Tandaliawala, Bangla Gogera, Satghara More, Renala Khurd, Pattoki, Bhai Phero, Manga Manadi and Chung
Source: https://www.google.com/maps
Table 2: Zn contents (mg kg-1) in roadside soil along FOR and N-5 during different seasons (mean ± SD)
Sites along Faisalabad to Okara Road (FOR) | ||||||
Seasons | Control | Khanuana | Sataiana | Tandaliawala | Bangla Gogera | Satghara More |
Summer | 35.14 ± 4.55 | 158.09 ± 11.47 | 167.73 ± 6.01 | 183.43 ± 4.65 | 145.10 ± 12.25 | 136.76 ± 5.40 |
Autumn | 28.43 ± 3.91 | 151.12 ± 4.73 | 169.41 ± 6.53 | 174.84 ± 2.54 | 117.09 ± 4.67 | 128.36 ± 5.30 |
Winter | 13.26 ± 4.12 | 101.91 ± 6.05 | 113.01 ± 3.86 | 139.32 ± 7.57 | 83.10 ± 6.43 | 78.96 ± 6.72 |
Spring | 19.12 ± 7.78 | 134.66 ± 4.65 | 127.13 ± 2.22 | 153.08 ± 6.62 | 104.42 ± 4.80 | 87.36 ± 5.72 |
Sites along Okara to Lahore Road (N-5) | ||||||
Control | Renala Khurd | Pattoki | Bhai Phero | Manga Mandi | Chung | |
Summer | 38.47 ± 3.93 | 164.71 ± 4.60 | 139.31 ± 6.01 | 189.18 ± 4.02 | 199.75 ± 3.71 | 209.73 ± 7.44 |
Autumn | 15.14 ± 5.32 | 140.29 ± 4.24 | 119.03 ± 6.67 | 154.17 ± 4.46 | 176.30 ± 5.46 | 192.17 ± 3.11 |
Winter | 14.96 ± 4.19 | 81.31 ± 6.51 | 64.98 ± 4.46 | 110.89 ± 10.75 | 130.45 ± 2.57 | 154.45 ± 1.99 |
Spring | 24.35 ± 3.30 | 84.77 ± 7.02 | 71.88 ± 6.52 | 134.75 ± 8.47 | 157.73 ± 3.83 | 176.07 ± 10.19 |
Correlations were calculated to estimate the relationship between traffic density and metal content in soil and plant leaves. During all four seasons, a strong correlation was found between average daily traffic and metal content in soil and plant leaves along both roads (Table 4).
Discussion
The present study revealed that Zn content in roadside soil along both “Faisalabad to Okara” and “Okara to Lahore” roads was significantly higher than control (~50 m away from road) site. Many studies have described that the Zn content in roadside soil decreased exponentially with per increase in distance from road (Akbar et al. 2006; Akan et al. 2013; Jankowski et al. 2015; Rolli et al. 2016). Significant amounts of Zn in roadside soil come from wear and tear of tyres, from galvanized parts of automobiles (Hjortenkrans 2008), soot and metal oxides, which run off from the road, into soil after precipitation (Malinowska et al. 2015). Furthermore, the release of metals also varies with vehicle type and age, type of fuel used, driving speed and road structure (Smith 1976).
Table 3: Zn contents (mg kg-1) in roadside plant leaves along FOR and N-5 during different seasons (mean ± SD)
Seasons | Plants | Sites along Faisalabad to Okara Road (FOR) | ||||||
Control | Khanuana | Sataiana | Tandaliawala | Bangla Gogera | Satghara More | Mean | ||
Summer | C. ciliaris | 12.55 ± 3.07 | 85.56 ± 3.01 | 85.59 ± 4.51 | 92.89 ± 2.10 | 88.91 ± 4.53 | 64.77 ± 4.73 | 83.54 ± 10.92 |
C. dactylon | 17.73 ± 2.11 | 100.88 ± 6.52 | 108.08 ± 6.05 | 114.69 ± 5.05 | 104.59 ± 5.68 | 92.47 ± 3.53 | 104.14 ± 8.27 | |
C. procera | 14.05 ± 1.73 | 90.54 ± 3.11 | 103.90 ± 8.00 | 108.96 ± 3.92 | 91.67 ± 2.12 | 47.47 ± 8.54 | 88.51 ± 24.26 | |
N. oleander | 13.46 ± 3.72 | 89.22 ± 6.00 | 78.92 ± 6.10 | 101.65 ± 3.52 | 79.55 ± 3.84 | 75.22 ± 2.95 | 84.91 ± 10.69 | |
R. communis | 18.97 ± 3.84 | 118.51 ± 7.01 | 99.44 ± 4.78 | 127.56 ± 12.04 | 112.25 ± 3.01 | 98.47 ± 7.90 | 111.25 ± 12.48 | |
Autumn | C. ciliaris | 11.47 ± 1.86 | 74.62 ± 4.22 | 55.24 ± 2.83 | 57.33 ± 5.44 | 71.77 ± 3.53 | 58.11 ± 3.50 | 63.41 ± 9.04 |
C. dactylon | 15.76 ± 1.17 | 92.29 ± 5.79 | 100.30 ± 4.46 | 95.76 ± 3.55 | 85.81 ± 3.63 | 60.46 ± 3.49 | 86.92 ± 15.71 | |
C. procera | 13.72 ± 1.82 | 88.56 ± 2.64 | 92.01 ± 4.63 | 98.56 ± 2.81 | 85.16 ± 2.96 | 75.54 ± 3.56 | 87.97 ± 8.53 | |
N. oleander | 11.37 ± 1.56 | 80.02 ± 4.03 | 61.33 ± 3.02 | 93.86 ± 3.05 | 77.84 ± 3.61 | 68.12 ± 2.51 | 76.23 ± 12.41 | |
R. communis | 16.16 ± 2.67 | 101.84 ± 3.51 | 107.83 ± 4.57 | 114.38 ± 3.71 | 96.78 ± 2.54 | 66.53 ± 4.58 | 97.47 ± 18.51 | |
Winter | C. ciliaris | 7.65 ± 1.78 | 61.84 ± 1.59 | 64.57 ± 3.60 | 60.94 ± 9.75 | 54.14 ± 9.27 | 48.19 ± 2.50 | 57.94 ± 6.66 |
C. dactylon | 9.47 ± 1.69 | 70.76 ± 2.55 | 76.64 ± 7.20 | 84.51 ± 2.01 | 58.99 ± 3.06 | 65.28 ± 3.51 | 71.24 ± 9.89 | |
C. procera | 9.06 ± 2.10 | 70.59 ± 5.62 | 75.69 ± 3.16 | 82.64 ± 2.63 | 65.89 ± 2.93 | 59.81 ± 12.30 | 70.92 ± 8.79 | |
N. oleander | 8.30 ± 0.33 | 63.09 ± 2.68 | 53.66 ± 4.72 | 76.81 ± 2.57 | 59.48 ± 4.01 | 53.80 ± 3.56 | 61.37 ± 9.51 | |
R. communis | 11.28 ± 1.56 | 86.19 ± 3.50 | 92.52 ± 6.74 | 100.14 ± 6.08 | 79.17 ± 2.50 | 70.97 ± 3.04 | 85.80 ± 11.35 | |
Spring | C. ciliaris | 8.81 ± 1.49 | 62.34 ± 2.87 | 68.15 ± 4.57 | 75.09 ± 2.50 | 53.77 ± 3.79 | 54.07 ± 3.07 | 62.68 ± 9.19 |
C. dactylon | 12.77 ± 2.83 | 81.52 ± 2.65 | 88.11 ± 2.84 | 81.95 ± 5.18 | 82.80 ± 3.47 | 74.83 ± 3.58 | 81.84 ± 4.73 | |
C. procera | 11.72 ± 1.98 | 66.43 ± 2.40 | 61.11 ± 5.73 | 90.79 ± 2.52 | 61.82 ± 9.09 | 67.35 ± 3.86 | 69.50 ± 12.21 | |
N. oleander | 9.71 ± 2.12 | 71.97 ± 4.20 | 78.74 ± 1.57 | 84.71 ± 3.05 | 69.09 ± 2.50 | 58.07 ± 2.12 | 72.52 ± 10.10 | |
R. communis | 13.82 ± 2.49 | 93.81 ± 3.97 | 81.95 ± 6.96 | 107.53 ± 2.64 | 96.15 ± 2.53 | 80.19 ± 2.50 | 91.93 ± 11.21 | |
Seasons | Plants | Sites along Okara to Lahore Road (N-5) | ||||||
Control | Renala Khurd | Pattoki | Bhai Phero | Manga Mandi | Chung | Mean | ||
Summer | C. ciliaris | 13.55 ± 2.10 | 82.74 ± 2.33 | 66.18 ± 4.08 | 89.13 ± 3.33 | 94.12 ± 2.47 | 99.44 ± 3.00 | 86.32 ± 12.84 |
C. dactylon | 18.73 ± 3.01 | 108.46 ± 7.57 | 95.73 ± 4.22 | 91.21 ± 4.41 | 112.27 ± 3.44 | 122.08 ± 2.84 | 105.95 ± 12.53 | |
C. procera | 17.05 ± 2.00 | 89.01 ± 1.66 | 82.71 ± 3.56 | 111.47 ± 6.65 | 83.78 ± 2.62 | 112.13 ± 2.56 | 95.82 ± 14.78 | |
N. oleander | 15.19 ± 1.53 | 79.52 ± 6.71 | 51.81 ± 3.02 | 92.65 ± 2.03 | 96.78 ± 3.75 | 105.15 ± 4.00 | 85.18 ± 20.83 | |
R. communis | 22.31 ± 3.80 | 112.86 ± 4.09 | 101.25 ± 4.77 | 117.78 ± 3.51 | 121.91 ± 3.07 | 130.23 ± 5.39 | 116.80 ± 10.78 | |
Autumn | C. ciliaris | 12.92 ± 1.54 | 59.12 ± 3.09 | 59.21 ± 6.19 | 75.78 ± 4.20 | 83.57 ± 3.79 | 92.89 ± 2.50 | 74.11 ± 14.93 |
C. dactylon | 17.00 ± 2.92 | 87.16 ± 3.46 | 79.86 ± 1.12 | 93.46 ± 3.01 | 104.07 ± 4.88 | 113.91 ± 3.27 | 95.69 ± 13.51 | |
C. procera | 14.64 ± 0.99 | 83.79 ± 2.04 | 63.11 ± 3.17 | 92.49 ± 3.20 | 111.68 ± 2.65 | 103.98 ± 7.31 | 91.01 ± 18.90 | |
N. oleander | 13.29 ± 2.53 | 97.79 ± 3.76 | 58.41 ± 6.03 | 82.81 ± 3.47 | 89.52 ± 8.24 | 97.69 ± 3.76 | 85.24 ± 16.25 | |
R. communis | 19.08 ± 3.18 | 97.91 ± 3.56 | 84.82 ± 3.55 | 106.14 ± 5.02 | 111.01 ± 5.31 | 118.48 ± 3.03 | 103.67 ± 12.92 | |
Winter | C. ciliaris | 7.27 ± 0.57 | 52.14 ± 1.94 | 43.95 ± 4.36 | 67.51 ± 5.37 | 65.98 ± 3.36 | 73.18 ± 1.50 | 60.55 ± 12.08 |
C. dactylon | 9.96 ± 0.55 | 68.38 ± 1.81 | 61.14 ± 2.50 | 75.81 ± 7.52 | 84.58 ± 1.91 | 93.85 ± 2.03 | 76.75 ± 12.93 | |
C. procera | 12.94 ± 7.62 | 64.81 ± 1.61 | 69.61 ± 7.59 | 86.32 ± 7.02 | 78.18 ± 2.50 | 86.14 ± 3.50 | 77.01 ± 9.68 | |
N. oleander | 4.52 ± 1.63 | 61.94 ± 3.77 | 48.50 ± 2.00 | 64.10 ± 3.10 | 72.14 ± 9.01 | 80.15 ± 5.50 | 65.37 ± 11.86 | |
R. communis | 10.05 ± 1.85 | 88.32 ± 3.79 | 67.15 ± 4.50 | 87.82 ± 2.57 | 101.51 ± 3.02 | 107.99 ± 4.73 | 90.56 ± 15.68 | |
Spring | C. ciliaris | 8.93 ± 1.09 | 60.81 ± 1.61 | 38.79 ± 7.11 | 68.62 ± 4.44 | 71.50 ± 3.65 | 81.10 ± 0.98 | 64.16 ± 15.94 |
C. dactylon | 11.64 ± 1.01 | 82.18 ± 3.50 | 71.49 ± 4.01 | 86.82 ± 4.53 | 97.49 ± 4.77 | 101.81 ± 0.72 | 87.96 ± 12.13 | |
C. procera | 11.05 ± 0.45 | 73.65 ± 3.61 | 65.22 ± 4.26 | 91.64 ± 6.23 | 86.15 ± 3.50 | 94.80 ± 4.55 | 82.29 ± 12.50 | |
N. oleander | 10.39 ± 1.28 | 67.17 ± 1.11 | 59.47 ± 3.00 | 75.85 ± 1.59 | 97.48 ± 5.50 | 93.48 ± 5.56 | 78.69 ± 16.44 | |
R. communis | 14.25 ± 1.15 | 92.14 ± 7.25 | 76.80 ± 2.58 | 102.18 ± 8.42 | 106.66 ± 3.33 | 113.82 ± 4.54 | 98.32 ± 14.37 |
Table 4: Pearson’s correlation coefficient between average daily traffic and Zn content in soil and plant leaves during different seasons along “FOR” and “N-5”
FOR | N-5 | |||||||
Summer | Autumn | Winter | Spring | Summer | Autumn | Winter | Spring | |
Soil | 0.98*** | 0.84* | 0.90** | 0.89** | 0.95*** | 0.99*** | 0.98*** | 0.81* |
C. ciliaris | 0.85* | -0.11 ns | 0.91** | 0.80* | 0.93** | 0.97*** | 0.97*** | 0.96*** |
C. dactylon | 0.95*** | 0.92** | 0.80* | 0.80* | 0.72 ns | 0.99*** | 0.98*** | 0.83* |
C. procera | 0.92** | 0.99*** | 0.95*** | 0.39 ns | 0.61 ns | 0.90** | 0.75 ns | 0.93*** |
N. oleander | 0.83* | 0.51 ns | 0.68 ns | 0.97*** | 0.91** | 0.64 ns | 0.99*** | 0.69 ns |
R. communis | 0.68 ns | 0.97*** | 0.96*** | 0.65 ns | 0.97*** | 0.96*** | 0.97*** | 0.93*** |
ns=non-significant; * , ** and ***= significant at 0.1, 0.05, 0.01 levels, respectively
Significant variations in Zn contamination existed among sites with highest Zn content at “Tandaliawala” and “Chung” site along “FOR” and “N-5” roads respectively. This was due to high vehicle traffic in these areas. Many studies have reported that sites with high vehicular density are more contaminated with metals (Apeagyei et al. 2011; Duong and Lee 2011; Popescu 2011). At “Pattoki” site minimum contamination was noted that could be due to protection by significant number of plants which include herbs shrubs and trees and the metal content in roadside soil with vegetation shield are significantly lower than without vegetation (Liu et al. 2012). Khan et al. (2011) reported that Zn content in soil ranged from 13.8 to 180 mg kg-1 along National Highway (Hyderabad, Pakistan). The Zn content in soil found during present study were higher than reported by others studies, 90.43 µg g-1 in Nigeria (Akan et al. 2013), 123.2 mg kg-1 in Karak, Jordan (Al-Khashman 2004) and lower than 499.20 mg kg-1 in Delhi (Banerjee 2003). However, the limit of Zn in soil is 100–150 mg kg-1 (ECDGE 2010).
A comparison between roads showed higher Zn content along “N-5” than “FOR”. This might be due to high traffic density along “N-5”. The contamination of Zn along roads is always directly linked to the age of road and “FOR” is a newly constructed road so it’s not only about the traffic density at a specific time but a lifetime traffic flow counts as well (Morse et al. 2016). The presence of Zn in the roadside soil indicated that vehicles are the key anthropogenic source of Zn pollution and the Zn contents may vary at different sites due to meteorological variations, road structure and traffic density (Khan et al. 2011).
The vehicular released metal that gets deposited on roadside soil may enter into plants and plants act as a sink of metal accumulation (Liu et al. 2012). These plants could be used as indicator of metal pollution (Berlizov et al. 2007). In present study maximum Zn contents in plants were recorded in “Tandaliawala “site along “FOR” and “Chung” site along “N-5”. The uptake of Zn by plants at different sites showed a linear relationship with Zn content in soil (Kabata-Pendias 2011).
Fig. 2: Mean of Zn content (mg kg-1 dry wt.) in plant leaves along “FOR”
Fig. 3: Mean of Zn content (mg kg-1 dry wt.) in plant leaves along “N-5”
Fig. 4: Spatial variations in mean Zn content (mg kg-1 dry wt.) in plant leaves along “FOR”
Fig. 5: Spatial variations in mean Zn content (mg kg-1 dry wt.) in plant leaves along “N-5”
Fig. 6: Temporal variations in mean Zn content (mg kg-1 dry wt.) in plant leaves along “FOR”
Fig. 7: Temporal variations in mean Zn content (mg kg-1 dry wt.) in plant leaves along “N-5”
During present study, the mean Zn contents in plant leaves along “FOR” and “N-5” were recorded in the following order R. communis > C. dactylon > C. procera > N. oleander > C. ciliaris. The Zn content in plant leaves varied significantly among different species (Nabulo et al. 2006) due to environmental factors and genotypes (Kabata-Pendias 2011). Hesami et al. (2018) noticed 740 mg kg-1 Zn uptake in Roemeria hybrid. In Gillgit, Pakistan, the highest Zn content (271.0 mg kg-1) was found in Brassica campestris and 247.0 mg kg-1 in Malva sylvestris (Khan et al. 2010). The standard limit of Zn in plant is 100 mg kg-1 (Allen et al. 1974). However, the safe limit of Zn for plant recommended by FAO/WHO (2011) is 60.0 mg kg-1. The mean Zn content in all plant species along both roads under investigation were above the permissible limit except for C. ciliaris along “FOR”, while at control site were within the safety limit. Concentrations of Zn in plants at polluted sites persisted to be significantly higher than control site plants. This showed a direct relationship of plant metal content with traffic volume signifying vehicles as the major source of heavy metals. All the selected plants are good indicator of Zn toxicity however, R. communis with highest levels of Zn could be used as the best indicator among all selected plant species and can be used to monitor and ameliorate heavy metal pollution along roadsides. All the plant species and soil samples showed highest Zn contents in summer and lowest in winter season. This might be due to high traffic density and wear of tyres at high temperature (Aksoy et al. 2000; Zaidi et al. 2005; Naveed et al. 2010).
A significant amount of Zn was found in petrol, diesel, used motor oil and soot (Fig. 10). A high level of Zn in diesel and lubrication oil was detected by Betha et al. (2012). Chin-Hsiang et al. (2009) observed that the relative contents of Zn by weight were 19.9% in diesel soot. Traces of Zn (0.7%) in soot were detected by Uy et al. (2014). Metal in soot was also reported by Fino et al. (2016). Diesel soot is responsible for 1/4th of total perilous atmospheric pollution (Omidvarborna et al. 2014). Hence, it can be concluded that a considerable amount of Zn come into the surroundings from vehicle soot (Malinowska et al. 2015).
Conclusion
Metal (Zn) contamination in the soil and plants along roadside was higher as compared to the control site (~ 50 meters from roadside). These concentrations were higher than the permissible levels set by WHO/FAO. This shows that environment along these roads is contaminated with vehicular released Zn metal. This could be hazardous for crops along roads and human residing near roads. Safety measures are requisite to overcome this toxicity problem. The results also indicated that all selected plants are reasonable indicators of vehicular related Zn pollution in the area. The maximum Zn uptake was detected in R. communis during Summer season so it could be a good choice for phytomonitoring purpose.
Fig. 8: Comparison among roads for mean Zn contents (mg kg-1 dry wt.) in soil
Fig. 9: Comparison among roads for mean Zn contents (mg kg-1 dry wt.) in plant leaves
Fig. 10: Zinc content in fuel and soot (mg kg-1)
Acknowledgement
This research project was funded by Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan (Indigenous Ph.D. Fellowship Program).
References
Aissa L, B Keloufi (2012). Determining the heavy metal pollution in Mascara (Algeria) by using Casuarina equisetifolia. Ecol Balk. 4:1‒7
Akan JC, SI Audu, Z Mohammed, VO Ogugbuaja (2013). Assessment of heavy metals, pH, organic matter and organic carbon in roadside soils in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State. Nig J Environ Prot 6:618‒628
Akbar KF, AD Headley, WHG Hale, M Athar (2006). Heavy metal contamination of roadside soils of Northern England. Soil Water Res 1:158‒163
Aksoy A, U Sahin, F Duman (2000). Robinia pseduo-acacia L. as a possible biomonitor of heavy metal pollution in Kayseri. Turk J Bot 24:279‒284
Al-Khashman OA (2004). Heavy metal distribution in dust, street dust and soils from the work place in Karak Industrial Estate. Jordan. Atmos Environ 38:6803‒6812
Allen SE, HM Grimshow, JA Parkinson, C Quarmby (1974). Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials, Blackwell Scientific Publications. Osney Mead, Oxford, UK
Apeagyei E, MS Bank, JD Spengler (2011). Distribution of heavy metals in road dust along an urban–rural gradient in Massachusetts. Atmos Environ 45:2310‒2323
Banerjee ADK (2003). Heavy metal levels and solid phase speciation in street dusts of Delhi, India. Environ Pollut 123:95‒105
Berlizov AN, OB Blum, RH Filby, IA Malyuk, VV Tryshyn (2007). Testing applicability of Black Poplar (Populus nigra L.) bark to heavy metal air pollution monitoring in urban and industrial regions. Sci Total Environ 372:693‒706
Betha R, S Pavagadhi, S Sethu, MP Hande, R Balasubramanian (2012). Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of airborne particulate matter emitted from stationary engine fueled with diesel and waste cooking oil derived biodiesel. Atmos Environ 61:23‒29
Cakmak I (2002). Plant nutrition research priorities to meet human needs for food in sustainable ways. Plant Sci 247:3‒24
Celik A, AA Kartal, A Akdogan, Y Kaska (2005). Determining the heavy metal pollution in Denizli (Turkey) by using Robinia pseudo-acacia L. Environ Intl 31:105‒112
Chin-Hsiang LUO, LEE Whei-May, LIAW Jiun-Jian (2009). Morphological and semi-quantitative characteristics of diesel soot agglomerates emitted from commercial vehicles and a dynamometer. J Environ Sci 21:452‒457
Deepalakshmi AP, H Ramakrishnaiah, YL Ramachandra, NN Kumar (2014). Leaves of higher plants as indicators of heavy metal pollution along the urban roadways. Int J Sci Technol. 3:340‒346
de Oliveira LM, JT Lessl, J Gress, R Tisarum, LR Guilherme, LQ Ma (2015). Chromate and phosphate inhibited each other's uptake and translocation in arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L. Environ Pollut. 197:240‒246
Duong TTT, BK Lee (2011). Determining contamination level of heavy metals in road dust from busy traffic areas with different characteristics. J Environ Manage 92:554‒562
ECDGE (2010). Heavy Metals and Organic Compounds from Wastes Usedas Organic Fertilizers. Final Rep., WPA Consulting Engineers Inc, pp:73‒74. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment /waste/compost/pdf/hm_finalreport.pdf
FAO/WHO (2011). Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, pp:64‒89. In: Report of the 5th session of the codex committee on contaminants in food (CCCF) Hague, Netherlands
Fino D, S Bensaid, M Piumetti, N Russo (2016). A review on the catalytic combustion of soot in diesel particulate filters for automotive applications: From powder catalysts to structured reactors. Appl Catal A Gen 509:75‒96
Graham RD, RM Welch, HE Bouis (2001). Addressing micronutrients malnutrition through enhancing the nutritional quality of staple foods principles, perspectives and knowledge gaps. Adv Agron 70:77‒142
Hernandez-Allica J, JM Becerril, C Garbisu (2008). Assessment of the phyto-extraction potential of high biomass crop plants. Environ Pollut 152:32‒40
Hesami R, A Salimi, SM Ghaderian (2018). Lead, zinc, and cadmium uptake, accumulation, and phytoremediation by plants growing around Tang-e Douzan lead-zinc mine, Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:8701–8714
Hjortenkrans D (2008). Road Traffic Metals – sources and Emissions. School of Pure and Applied Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar, Sweden
Jankowski K, GA Ciepiela, J Jankowska, W Szulc, R Kolczarek, J Sosnowski, B Wisniewska-Kadzajan, E Malinowska, E Radzka, W Czeluscinski, J Deska (2015). Content of lead and cadmium in aboveground plant organs of grasses growing on the areas adjacent to route of big traffic. Environ Sci Pollu Res 22:978‒987
Jian-Hua MA, C Chun-Jie, L Jian, S Bo (2009). Heavy metal pollution in soils on railroad side of Zhengzhou-Putian section of Longxi – Haizhou railroad, China. Pedosphere 19:121‒128
Joshi SR, R Kumar, RK Bhagobaty, S Thokchom (2010). Impact of pollution on microbial activities in sub-tropical forest soil of north east India. Res J Environ Sci 3:280‒287
Kabata-Pendias A (2011) Trace Elements in Soils and Plants. CRC Press, New York, USA
Khan MN, AA Wasim, A Sarwar, MF Rasheed (2011). ‘Assessment of heavy metal toxicants in the roadside soil along the N-5, National Highway, Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess 182:587‒595
Khan S, S Rehman, AZ Khan, MA Khan, MT Shah (2010). Soil and vegetables enrichment with heavy metals from geological sources in Gilgit, northern Pakistan. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:1820‒1827
Liu Q, Y Liu, M Zhang (2012). Mercury and cadmium contamination in traffic soil of Beijing, China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 88:154‒157
Liu YJ, YG Zhu, H Ding (2007). Lead and cadmium in leaves of deciduous trees in Beijing, China: Development of a metal accumulation index (MAI). Environ Pollut 145:387‒390
Malinowska E, K Jankowski, B Wisniewska-Kadzajan, J Sosnowski, R Kolczarek, J Jankowska, GA Ciepiela (2015). Content of Zinc and Copper in selected plants growing along a motorway. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 95:638‒643
Mignorance MD, RS Olivia (2006). Heavy metals content in N. oleander leaves as urban pollution assessment. Environ Monit Assess. 119:57‒68
Mmolawa KB, AS Likuku, GK Gaboutloeloe (2010). Reconnaissance of Heavy Metal Distribution and Enrichment around Botswana’ Proceeding of 5th International Environmental Science and Technology Conference, pp:22‒27. 12–16 July 2010. Houston, Texas, USA
Morse N, MT Walter, D Osmond, W Hunt (2016). Roadside soils show low available zinc and copper concentrations. Environ Pollut 209:30‒37
Nabulo G, H Oryem-Origa, M Diamond (2006). Assessment of lead, cadmium, and zinc contamination of roadside soils, surface films, and vegetables in Kampala City, Uganda. Environ Res 101:42‒52
Nauciene Z, V Mildaziene, R Baniene (2002). Interaction of cadmium and copper ions with Complex I of the respiratory chain in rat liver mitochondria. Ekologija 2:18‒21
Naveed NH, AI Batool, Fayyaz-ur-Rehman, U Hameed (2010). Leaves of roadside plants as bioindicator of traffic related lead pollution during different seasons in Sargodha, Pakistan. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 4:770‒774
Nazzal Y, MA Rosen, AM Al-Rawabdeh (2013). Assessment of metal pollution in urban road dusts from selected highways of the Greater Toronto area in Canada. Environ Monit Assess 185:1847‒1858
Nielsen FH (2012). History of Zinc in agriculture, USDA, ARS, grand forks human nutrition research center, Grand Forks, ND. Adv Nutr 3:783‒789
Okoronkwo AE, AF Aiyesanmi, AC Odiyi, OM Sunday, I Shoetan (2014). Bioaccumulation of cadmium in siam (Chromolaena odorata) and node (Synedrella nodiflora) weeds: Impact of ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (edta) on uptake. Environ Nat Resou Res. 4:39–49
Omidvarborna H, A Kumar, SS Kim (2014). Characterization of particulate matter emitted from transit buses fueled with B20 in idle modes. J Environ Chem Eng 2:2335‒2342
Onder S, S Dursun (2006). Air borne heavy metal pollution on Cedrus libani (A. Rich.) in the city centre of Konya (Turkey). Atmos Environ 40:1122‒1133
Panda SK, I Chaudhury, MH Khan (2003). Heavy metals induced lipid peroxidation and affect antioxidants in wheat leaves. Biol Plantarum 46:289‒294
Pathak AK, R Kumar, P Kumar, S Yadav (2015). Sources apportionment and spatio-temporal changes in metal pollution in surface and sub-surface soils of a mixed type industrial area in India. J Geochem Explor 159:169‒177
Popescu CG (2011). Relation between vehicle traffic and heavy metals content from the particulate matters. Roman Rep Phys 63:471‒482
Reichman SM (2002). The Responses of Plants to Metal Toxicity: A Review Focusing on Copper, Manganese and Zinc. In: Plants and Metal, Australian Minerals and Energy Environment Foundation, pp:16‒23. Reichman SM (Ed.). Melbourne, Australia
Rolli NM, SB Gadi, TP Giraddi (2016). Bioindicators: Study on uptake and accumulation of heavy metals in plant leaves of state highway road, Bagalkot. Ind J Agric Ecol Res Intl 6:1‒8
Sagardoy R, F Morales, AF Lopez-Millan, A Abadia, J Abadia (2009). Effects of zinc toxicity on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants grown in hydroponics. Plant Biol 11:339‒350
Smith WH (1976). Lead contamination of the roadside ecosystem, yale university. J Air Pollut Cont Assoc 26:753‒766
Steel RGD, JH Torrie (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, with Special Reference to Biological Science, 3rd edn, pp:318‒329. McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, USA
Thorpe A, RM Harrison (2008). Sources and properties of non-exhaust particulate matter from road traffic: A review. Sci Total Environ 400:270‒282
Uy D, MA Ford, DT Jayne, AE O'Neill, LP Haack, J Hangas, MJ Jagner, A Sammut, AK Gangopadhyay (2014). Characterization of gasoline soot and comparison to diesel soot: Morphology, chemistry, and wear. Tribol Intl 80:198‒209
Wang C, SH Zhang, PF Wang, J Hou, WJ Zhang, W Li, ZP Lin (2009). The effect of excess Zn on mineral nutrition and antioxidative response in rapeseed seedlings. Chemosphere 75:1468‒1476
Werkenthin M, B Kluge, G Wessolek (2014). Metals in European roadside soils and soil solution – a review. Environ Pollut 189:98‒110
Wyszkowska J, A Borowik, M Kucharski, J Kucharsk (2013). Effect of cadmium, copper and zinc on plants, soil microorganisms and soil enzymes. J Elem 18:769‒796
Zaidi MI, A Asrar, A Mansoor, MA Farooqi (2005). The heavy metal concentration along roadside trees of Quetta and its effects on Public health. J Appl Sci 5:708‒711